Question
Answer and Explanation
Yes, you can inline the animation name directly within the CSS animation
property. This is a common practice and is perfectly valid in CSS.
When you define an animation using @keyframes
, you typically give it a name. Instead of referencing this name separately in the animation-name
property, you can include it directly within the shorthand animation
property.
Here's how you can do it:
.element {
animation: myAnimation 2s linear infinite;
}
@keyframes myAnimation {
from { transform: translateX(0); }
to { transform: translateX(100px); }
}
In this example, myAnimation
is the name of the animation defined using @keyframes
. Instead of writing:
.element {
animation-name: myAnimation;
animation-duration: 2s;
animation-timing-function: linear;
animation-iteration-count: infinite;
}
You can combine all these properties into a single animation
property, making your CSS more concise and readable.
The order of values in the animation
shorthand property is as follows: animation-name
, animation-duration
, animation-timing-function
, animation-delay
, animation-iteration-count
, animation-direction
, animation-fill-mode
, and animation-play-state
. While only animation-name
and animation-duration
are required, it's good practice to include at least the duration and timing function for clarity.
Inlining the animation name is a standard and efficient way to define animations in CSS, and it helps keep your stylesheets organized and easier to maintain.