Why is there no appropriate protocol for SSH in a shared mailbox?

The question "Why is there no appropriate protocol for SSH in a shared mailbox?" is based on a misunderstanding of the purpose of SSH (Secure Shell) and shared mailboxes. SSH is a network protocol that provides a secure method to access a remote computer over a network, typically used for command-line access, file transfer, and tunneling. Shared mailboxes, on the other hand, are designed for email communication and collaboration.

Here's why it doesn't make sense to have an SSH protocol for a shared mailbox:

1. Different Functionalities:

- SSH: SSH focuses on secure remote access and execution of commands on a server. It uses concepts like users, authentication, sessions, and a command-line interface or file transfer protocols like SFTP/SCP.

- Shared Mailbox: A shared mailbox is a collection of emails accessed by multiple authorized users. Its core function is to receive, send, and manage emails collectively using protocols like SMTP, IMAP, or Exchange ActiveSync. It is focused on messaging and collaboration.

2. Authentication and Access Control:

- SSH: SSH uses user-based authentication (usernames and passwords or public key authentication) to verify who is accessing a remote system. Access control is managed based on server permissions.

- Shared Mailbox: Access to a shared mailbox is typically managed through email server settings, often based on user accounts within the email system's environment (e.g., Active Directory groups). The focus is on email permissions and not direct system access.

3. Protocol Mismatch:

- SSH is designed to create a secure, interactive terminal session. It operates at a lower level than the email protocols used for shared mailboxes. An analogy would be using a hammer to turn a screw. The tools are designed for different tasks.

- Email protocols (like SMTP for sending and IMAP/Exchange ActiveSync for retrieving email) are used for reading, sending, and managing emails. They do not provide the kind of system access that SSH facilitates.

4. Security Implications:

- Providing SSH access to a mailbox would involve granting a much broader range of access than necessary or intended, potentially creating severe security vulnerabilities. If someone could directly SSH into the system storing a mailbox, they could bypass email-level permissions entirely.

In summary, trying to use SSH for a shared mailbox is like trying to use a key to unlock a door that requires a credit card; the protocols are fundamentally incompatible and address different types of access and functionality. The existing email protocols are sufficient for managing and accessing shared mailboxes; SSH would be entirely inappropriate.

Learn more about this