Why is Flask not using threading?

Flask itself doesn't inherently avoid using threading. In fact, Flask can use threading, and it often does, especially in development environments. However, it's crucial to understand the nuances of how Flask handles concurrency and why you might not always see explicit threading code in a Flask application.

Here's a breakdown of why the question "Why is Flask not using threading?" arises:

1. Development Server's Behavior:

- Flask's built-in development server (Werkzeug) does use threading by default. This allows it to handle multiple requests concurrently. If you start a Flask application using app.run(), it implicitly uses threading for handling incoming requests. This is primarily for convenience during development.

2. Production Deployment:

- Werkzeug's built-in server is not meant for production. For production deployments, you would typically use a WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) server like Gunicorn or uWSGI. These servers handle concurrency in various ways, which may or may not involve threading directly.

3. Concurrency Models in Production:

- WSGI servers offer different concurrency models:

- Threading: Gunicorn, for example, can be configured to use multiple worker threads within each process. This allows it to handle multiple requests concurrently within a single Python process, circumventing the GIL (Global Interpreter Lock) limitations to some extent for I/O-bound tasks.

- Multiprocessing: WSGI servers often use multiple processes. Each process has its own Python interpreter and memory space. This allows them to truly utilize multiple CPU cores, bypassing the GIL limitations. However, sharing data between processes requires inter-process communication (IPC), which can add complexity.

- Asynchronous (asyncio): Some setups use asynchronous frameworks (like asyncio) in conjunction with servers like uvicorn. This allows a single thread to handle multiple requests concurrently through non-blocking I/O.

4. The Global Interpreter Lock (GIL):

- Python's GIL allows only one thread to hold control of the Python interpreter at any given time. This means that even with multiple threads, CPU-bound operations will not achieve true parallelism within a single process. This limitation often pushes developers towards multiprocessing for CPU-intensive tasks.

5. Explicit Threading in Application Code:

- You might not see threading code explicitly written within your Flask application code because the WSGI server handles the concurrency layer. However, you might use threading in your Flask application for background tasks, such as sending emails, processing data in the background, or interacting with external services asynchronously.

- When using threads directly in your Flask app, be mindful of the application context. You can use with app.app_context(): to ensure that the thread has access to the Flask application's configuration and resources.

6. Example of using threading in flask:

from flask import Flask
import threading
import time

app = Flask(__name__)

def background_task():
    with app.app_context():
        print("Background task started")
        time.sleep(5)
        print("Background task finished")

@app.route('/')
def index():
    thread = threading.Thread(target=background_task)
    thread.start()
    return "Hello, World! Background task started."

if __name__ == '__main__':
    app.run(debug=True)

In summary, Flask itself doesn't avoid threading, but it often relies on the WSGI server to handle the concurrency aspects of serving web requests in a production environment. If you need background tasks or asynchronous operations within your Flask application, you can certainly use threading or other concurrency mechanisms like asyncio.

Learn more about this